Dear All,
Here are the video recaps from last week.
My
main recommendation this time is the tree-way discussion with Professor
David Gibbs and Colonel Macgregor. The colonel gave a lot of first-hand
information about his time with NATO in the Balkans, which actually
clarifies quite a lot in terms of preparations for the wars that
followed after the breakup of Yugoslavia was already a reality.
If you prefer reading, the summary and transcript are on the homepage: https://neutralitystudies.com/videos/9v-Ik9N21JI
Cheers,
Pascal

Saturday, August 22, 2026
Steve
Jermy argues for a Westphalia II, moving from deterrence to cooperation
with Russia. He champions diplomacy, neutrality as a security
guarantee, and OSCE-led confidence-building measures plus Track Two
talks. He warns of air-defense gaps, drone and hypersonic threats,
energy-price shocks, urging sanctions relief and citizen-driven peace
momentum.

Monday, August 24, 2026
Steven
Starr warns of escalating nuclear risks: dwindling conventional
munitions, expanded tactical-nuke options, and a lowered threshold for
first use. He flags Israel, Iran, and Europe as flashpoints, warns about
EMP and firestorm risks, and critiques NATO’s nuclear umbrella and
recent drone escalations as dangerous precursors to war.

Tuesday, August 25, 2026
Tord
Björk argues the Helsinki Final Act opened cooperation and peace
movements, but Finland’s NATO accession and post-1989 weakened the
process. He laments the erasure of the peace movement, critiques NGO
professionalization, and calls for a unified, multi-issue, local-action
movement—planting potatoes and building friendships to resist
militarization and domination.

Thursday, August 27, 2026
Pietro
Shakarian argues Trump’s Third Red Scare aims to crush dissent on
foreign policy, especially Iran and the Strait of Hormuz. He warns US
overstretch and Europe’s subordination to Washington, discusses the
Mecca Pact, NATO erosion, Ukraine’s rump-state future, and a global
shift toward multipolarity.

Friday, August 28, 2026
David
Gibbs and Douglas Macgregor critique NATO’s Yugoslav interventions,
arguing humanitarian justifications masked strategic aims: expanding
NATO, reshaping Europe’s order, and pressuring Russia. Macgregor recalls
warnings on Albanian refugees and Kosovo decision-making; Gibbs links
Bosnia, Kosovo, Rambouillet to neocon influence and Europe’s NATO
dependence.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire