CIA à Moscou : la vérité éclate sur la visite surprise, nouvel échec pour Trump

 

Londres vient-il de déclarer la guerre à la Russie ?

 Chers amis de Paix et Guerre,

Au programme de cette Mondoscopie, 137e édition :

1) Ukraine : Londres remet une pièce dans la machine
2) Iran : le pacte de la Mecque met au défi le projet américain de domination / fragmentation du Moyen-Orient

Pour rejoindre et devenir membre du Cercle Paix et Guerre afin d'avoir accès à de nouveaux contenus exclusifs :

   / @cgalacteros  

🌐 Merci à notre partenaire NordVPN pour son soutien tout au long de l’année : https://nordvpn.com/galacteros

Merci de liker et partager cette vidéo de vous abonner sans oublier d’activer la petite 🔔 vous permettant de recevoir nos alertes. 

Soutenez nous: 
https://fr.tipeee.com/paix-et-guerre-...

Bonne écoute, 
CG

Neutrality Studies Weekly Recap #34

 August 15 → August 22, 2026

Aug 26

READ IN APP

Dear All,

Here are the video recaps from last week.

I particularly recommend watching (or reading on the homepage) the discussion by Nel Bonilla, who always has a brilliant way of explaining mass-violence in a system theoretical and holistic way.

Her (scary) conclusion is that the US and NATO are not at all as „headless“ a chicken as they might look at the moment. Their longterm planing has a horizon of decades and is clearly geared toward more war.

Best,

Pascal

Upgrade to paid

---

Iran War Round 3: Tehran Prepares Knock-Out Blow | Prof. S.M. Marandi

Saturday, August 15, 2026

Prof. S.M. Marandi argues Iran endures Western siege by diversifying trade routes (China, Central Asia, Turkey, Iraq) and preparing for long war with missiles/drones. He says Iran opposes nuclear weapons, caps missile range, seeks US base withdrawal, and avoids destabilizing Saudi Arabia, while Gulf states wobble amid US decline.

🚨ESCALATION: Trade War Gets Worse, Iran War Extends to Ukraine | Stas Krapivnik

Monday, August 17, 2026

Stas Krapivnik assesses the Turkey-Pakistan-Saudi alliance and its Iran-facing calculus, noting only ministry statements so far. He contrasts NATO Article 5 and Article 4, discusses Saudi financing, Pakistan’s Iran links, Turkish Kurdish risks, and Saudi–Houthis. He outlines Russia’s Ukraine push, maritime escalation, and weather’s impact on combat tempo.

Eurasia Breaks USA: Three Front Defeat Forming | Prof. Radhika Desai

Wednesday, August 19, 2026

Radhika Desai outlines three fronts challenging U.S. dominance: Korea peace efforts and the erosion of the U.S. military umbrella; the dollar debt trap and IMF/World Bank-led restructurings; and China’s rise, China Shock 2.0, with Western overcapacity and neoliberal demand woes. She also discusses MAGA splits and East-West Asia dynamics.

NATO’s Plans for Total Global Dominance & The Bunker State | Nel Bonilla

Thursday, August 20, 2026

Nel Bonilla outlines the bunker state framework and NATO 3.0 as a shift toward deeper militarization and a transatlantic defense ecosystem. She argues NATO is a node, not a driver, with Europe facing mobilization, conscription, and proxy warfare, funded by private capital toward a global West, while peace movements resist.

US Empire Defeated: Multipolarity Wins Against Colonial West | Dr Kee Beng Ooi

Friday, August 21, 2026

Kee Beng Ooi argues globalization is shifting toward a multipolar order where Western dominance wanes and China’s rise reshapes decolonization. He surveys Southeast Asia’s optimism, Bandung’s legacy, ASEAN centrality, and the Malacca Strait as a maritime hub. He urges re-educating the West, embracing equal sovereignty, and a decolonized language.

---

Disclaimer: The above are AI-generated summaries.

LE SIGNAL - 25/08/2026

 

Macron prépare un coup majeur en Ukraine : la Russie directement mise au défi

 

Armed Neutrality & The Consistent Renunciation of War

A Left-Wing Position on Switzerland’s Military Sovereignty Pascal Lottaz Aug 19   READ IN APP   Rosa Luxemburg in the Swiss Alps. Integrale, armed neutrality is a quintessentially left concept. Text By Niklaus Ramseyer, Berne. (Original article here in German) Armed neutrality means consistently renouncing war as a primitive, backward instrument of foreign policy. It represents progress away from war and toward peace. For 170 years, Switzerland has had no enemies—either in the region or worldwide, and certainly no military enemies. During that time, it has neither waged a war nor had to endure one. This stands in stark contrast to every other European state. We on the Swiss left must defend the peaceful character of our neutral country. Switzerland without war! Why? Not because the country wants nothing to do with the military or supposedly understands nothing about it. For a long time, Switzerland was said not to “have” an army but to “be” an army. This was because of its militia system (a largely citizen-soldier army), which forgoes professional troops but requires every citizen deemed fit for service—and allows women to volunteer—to receive military training by the age of 20 at the latest. It was also because, after completing that training, soldiers took their personal infantry weapon, an assault rifle, home with them—the much-debated but unique “rifle in the cupboard.” A militia army strictly limited to emergency defence, together with an armed citizenry and the rifle in the cupboard: this is exactly what the legendary socialist Rosa Luxemburg called for in a well-founded analysis of the “New Army,” published on 9 June 1911 in the Leipziger Volkszeitung, of which she was editor-in-chief. Even today, Switzerland’s military and defence policy corresponds quite closely to Luxemburg’s defensive, progressive, and peace-oriented ideas. A militia army, neutrality, and the renunciation of wars of intervention are therefore decidedly left-wing concepts. Upgrade to paid Always a Country with an Army—Never a Country of War Switzerland is certainly a country with an army and a military. But it has never been a country of war—least of all of intervention, aggression, and occupation beyond its borders. The reason is Swiss neutrality. As almost no other country in the world does, Switzerland consciously and consistently renounces war as a primitive and backward “instrument” of foreign policy. Unlike in nearly every other state, war in the Swiss Confederation is not an “instrument” in the government’s hands with which it could violently and destructively impose its foreign-policy or even global “interests” (see Clausewitz, On War, 1832). Our country would go to war only if it were attacked militarily. In that event, every Swiss citizen fit for service would be called upon to contribute to the country’s defence within the militia system. The purely defensive—rather than offensive and invasive—nature of this security and defence concept is also evident in the structure of the Swiss armed forces: they are organized so as to be “structurally incapable of attack.” This is particularly apparent in logistics: a collection system without long-range transport aircraft, unlike the delivery systems used by NATO or US forces that wage wars around the world. It is also apparent in the preference for more defensive weapons systems. The country does not need bombers such as the F-35 that can be deployed in invasions worldwide. After all, the Swiss Armed Forces’ main task is not to be able to wage wars somewhere against someone. It is to keep all wars away from our own country. Switzerland’s militia army is not a “war-fighting army” but a “war-prevention army.” For more than 170 years—since the brilliant Guillaume Henri Dufour—it has fulfilled this principal mission far more successfully than any other army in Europe. The political foundation of this peaceful and highly successful security concept is neutrality. It should be understood in purely military and security-policy terms. Small Switzerland, at the heart of Europe, threatens no one and nothing—certainly not militarily. In return, it enjoys considerable esteem, respect, and trust around the world. Switzerland has few adversaries and no enemies—certainly no military ones. Upgrade to paid Social Democrats and Free-Market Liberals Call for NATO Instead of Neutrality Switzerland’s uniquely successful and progressive security policy is now being questioned and attacked—from both the right and the left. Demands for “greater cooperation” with NATO, which wages wars worldwide and remains dominated by and dependent on the United States, and for “security cooperation” with the EU come from the FDP.The Liberals (Switzerland’s free-market liberal party) and The Centre (a centrist Swiss political party). Unfortunately, they also come from parts of the Social Democratic Party and the Greens. The right argues that, as part of an informal “West,” our country must also help conduct a “united” struggle—under US leadership—against Russia, Islamism, and China. The governing left, for its part, views Switzerland’s independently sovereign security policy and neutrality as obstacles to the country’s long-desired “integration” into the Brussels-based EU. Supposed “leftists” even call for our army to join NATO—or at least to move “closer” to it. Both political camps promote the belief that Switzerland could not defend itself militarily on its own. Yet historical and current examples—from Vietnam and Afghanistan to Ukraine and Iran—show how successfully determined defenders can fight on their own strong terrain, even against attackers that appear vastly superior at first sight. Nevertheless, politicians receive some support from officials and career military officers in the DDPS (Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sport) and at the top of the armed forces, both of which have suffered from weak political leadership for decades. They, too, disparage Switzerland’s defensive army and claim that alignment with NATO is therefore unavoidable—and that rearmament in accordance with Trump’s demands is urgently needed here as well. Thus, a motley collection of “NATO adapters”—career military officers and DDPS officials under weak political leadership, alongside politicians of the left and centre—are fighting against our peaceful country’s military sovereignty and neutrality: fundamental Swiss principles that they should, on the contrary, be defending. This is particularly embarrassing for the members of the Social Democratic Party of Switzerland (SP/SPS) in this alliance. Only a few years ago, their party programme still championed self-government, sovereignty, and a policy of peace. In fact, only two countries in Europe remain sovereign in military-policy terms today: France and Switzerland—for now. Neither tolerates foreign bases, and both retain full democratic control over all their own troops in the country. Every other NATO country “hosts” US occupation troops on sealed-off bases within its territory, over which it has no control and often not even access. Several NATO governments in the EU even accept bases for US nuclear missiles. Contrary to the brazen claims of NATO ideologues, these US military positions, advanced thousands of kilometres eastward, are not “protective umbrellas.” On the contrary, they are grave sources of danger. In an emergency, they would be the first targets of preventive strikes, with hundreds of thousands of uninvolved people in the surrounding areas becoming “collateral” victims. Wars of Aggression in NATO’s Wake Instead of Defence Only in an Emergency With their attacks on Switzerland’s military sovereignty and neutrality, the Social Democrats, FDP.The Liberals, and The Centre do not seek to restore to the Federal Council (Switzerland’s seven-member federal government) the power to wage war claimed and exploited by the backward governments of militarized great powers. For a small country such as Switzerland, that would in any case be illusory, if not ridiculous. No. Under the banner of “cooperation,” they intend gradually to professionalize the hitherto purely defensive Swiss militia army—through continuous-service conscripts (soldiers who complete their service in one uninterrupted period)—and coolly move it closer to NATO through exercises, planning, intelligence, and ammunition procurement beyond the country’s borders. Swiss soldiers are once again supposed to learn and practise aggression, invasion, and occupation in exercises abroad, instead of defending the country on its own strong terrain. Everything would take place under NATO supreme command and, ultimately, as auxiliary forces for the US Army, which wages wars worldwide. Decisions about whom to mobilize against and whom to fire upon if necessary would no longer be made under the “primacy of politics” (civilian political control) in Bern, but by military planning staffs somewhere in Mons or Tampa Bay. Those staffs would naturally demand reciprocity in the form of NATO exercises here in our country. For our sovereign, neutral state, that is an absolute no-go. There is no middle position between military sovereignty with neutrality, on the one hand, and subordination to NATO—called “cooperation”—on the other. The foreign base used by Switzerland’s SWISSCOY continuous-service personnel in Kosovo (the Swiss contingent supporting KFOR)—a.k.a. “mercenaries,” as the author puts it—is, in practice, the sandbox and training ground for integrating our armed forces into NATO. It is a typical follower-and-auxiliary deployment under the NATO command of KFOR (the NATO-led Kosovo Force). In Ferizaj, Kosovo, KFOR guards and secures Camp Bondsteel in particular, the largest US military base in Europe. It is astonishing, even alarming, that supposed leftists in the Social Democratic Party of Switzerland continue to support military adventures of this kind. They carelessly surrender democratic control over defensive forces in our own country while accepting foreign NATO control over our troops during invasive missions elsewhere. They even do so under the more than cynical heading of “solidarity” with “peacekeeping forces.” For the modern “integrationist Social Democrats”—and even for the Greens—solidarity, it seems, now also “grows out of the barrel of a gun.” In short—and it is not good: we are moving away from Switzerland’s sovereign, democratically controlled defensive army and toward semi-professional follower and participation forces under foreign command on NATO training grounds or even in NATO “war theatres” that are not ours and cannot be ours. And we are expected to pay for this dangerous nonsense as well. US and EU Sanctions Have Nothing to Do with the Rule of Law Unfortunately, the same conformism and eagerness to participate are even more evident in relation to US and EU sanctions. If these sanctions had even the slightest basis in the rule of law, they would have to rest on the following legal standard: “Regimes and governments that systematically disregard and violate human rights and international law shall be appropriately sanctioned and boycotted.” Properly applied under the rule of law, these rules would naturally have to apply equally to every usurper, perpetrator of genocide, and war criminal. Russia would certainly be sanctioned—but so, without question, would Israel, the United States, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia. Yet nothing of the sort happens. Sanctions are arbitrarily imposed only on countries—and individuals—that refuse to dance to Washington’s tune, from Cuba and Iran to North Korea and Russia. And not only by the United States itself: by threatening sanctions, Washington also coerces many smaller states in its “values-based West,” even though those states have no problems, tensions, or conflicts with the countries targeted by US sanctions. Switzerland, for example, is threatened by neither Cuba nor Iran nor North Korea. Yet under pressure from the United States and the EU, the Federal Council sanctions those countries so severely that it has become almost impossible to transfer aid funds to Cuba. Transfers to Taiwan, by contrast, remain possible at any time without difficulty. Switzerland’s Untenably Submissive Embargo Act The reason for our federal government’s timid and embarrassing conduct lies in Switzerland’s Embargo Act of March 2002. Article 1 states: “The Confederation may enact coercive measures in order to implement sanctions that have been ordered by the United Nations Organization, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe or by Switzerland’s most significant trading partners, and which serve to secure compliance with international law, and in particular respect for human rights.” There would probably be little objection to this wording. But the Embargo Act is not a Swiss law governed by clear rules that apply equally to everyone. It is a vague mechanism for joining in and enforcing measures on a case-by-case basis. Moreover, it starkly contradicts the separation of powers: sanctions may be imposed—or their imposition assisted—not by the courts but by the government, the Federal Council. Worse still, there is simply no right of appeal to a higher authority against its decisions, although such a right should be self-evident under the rule of law. The phrase “or by Switzerland’s most significant trading partners” is also untenable and even dangerous. Instead of laying down clear rules that apply to everyone, it opens the door wide to those trading partners’ arbitrariness and pursuit of power—and to compelling neutral Switzerland to support their trade wars. On the basis of this absurd provision, Washington in particular can place the Federal Council under enormous pressure and demand that our country sanction states with which we have neither problems nor conflicts of any kind. It is alarming that left-wing and Green members of the Federal Assembly (Switzerland’s parliament) supported and continue to defend such dangerous nonsense. The neutrality initiative (a Swiss federal popular initiative) now seeks to correct these serious defects in Switzerland’s Embargo Act by deleting the reference to “significant trading partners”—nothing more and nothing less. But during the referendum campaign, the Social Democratic left—and the Greens as well—will once again stand on the wrong side: on the side of war within the NATO alliance rather than peace and Swiss neutrality, and on the side of arbitrary US sanctions in Washington’s trade wars rather than clear rules, applied equally to all, under the rule of law. That is certainly not left-wing politics. Niklaus Ramseyer is a Swiss journalist. He served as Bundeshaus correspondent for the Basler Zeitung. Pascal’s Substack (Neutrality Studies) is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Upgrade to paid

COL. Douglas Macgregor : Is Putin Losing Patience?

 

Michael Hudson : le système financier occidental au bord de l’effondrement

 

21 août 2026

Le professeur Michael Hudson, économiste classique de renommée mondiale, évoque l'histoire de la finance et explique pourquoi le système financier occidental est au bord de l'effondrement. Suivez les travaux de Michael Hudson : https://michael-hudson.com/ Achetez des produits dérivés Diesen : https://diesen-shop.fourthwall.com/en... Suivez le professeur Glenn Diesen : Substack : https://glenndiesen.substack.com/ X/Twitter : https://x.com/Glenn_Diesen Patreon :   / glenndiesen   Soutenez les recherches du professeur Glenn Diesen : PayPal : https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/glenn... Offrez-moi un café : buymeacoffee.com/gdieseng Go Fund Me : https://gofund.me/09ea012f Livres du professeur Glenn Diesen : https://www.amazon.com/stores/author/... Original Video:    • Michael Hudson: The West's Financial Syste...   Original Transcript: https://www.video-translations.org/tr... Translated Transcript: https://www.video-translations.org/tr... Produced by: Glenn Diesen Originally Published on: 2026-08-20 Translations by: www.video-translations.org Disclaimer: Read by A.I. Voices. Auto-translated.

Crazy Plan to Smash Moscow Airports. Poland's Tusk Blames Germany. China's D-Day Reply

 21 août 2026  Alex Christoforou Podcast
Crazy Plan to Smash Moscow Airports. Poland's Tusk Blames Germany. China's D-Day Reply
Topic 2155

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE:
╔═╦╗╔╦╗╔═╦═╦╦╦╦╗╔═╗
║╚╣║║║╚╣╚╣╔╣╔╣║╚╣═╣ 
╠╗║╚╝║║╠╗║╚╣║║║║║═╣
╚═╩══╩═╩═╩═╩╝╚╩═╩═╝

BUY ME A COFFEE: https://buymeacoffee.com/alexchristof...
BTC: bc1q7ff0r8mnt04a4cj3krakzn4fmar28pv43ds2xe
ETH: 0x96ee7fedae52f3a263bb499300ab0f641faef496
LTC: ltc1qs333rf24gwh6tnusl60at7m77way0q4699vule
XRP: rH6WnYnLP3MwKqJMapoofyxCeNbMEK3pp6

THE DURAN:    / @theduran  
ALEXANDER:    / alexandermercourisreal  

SUBSTACK: https://theduran.substack.com/
X: https://x.com/AXChristoforou
LOCALS: https://theduran.locals.com (1 Month Free Trial)

RUMBLE: 
https://rumble.com/c/theduran
https://rumble.com/c/AlexChristoforou
https://rumble.com/c/AlexanderMercouris

SPOTIFY: http://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/...
APPLE PODCASTS: https://apple.co/2H9Hk0a

THE DURAN SHOP: https://theduranshop.com

SUBSCRIBE STAR: https://subscribestar.com/theduran 
PATREON:   / theduran  

Amazing music contribution from Peter Brown. 
Follow Peter's music:   / peterboy100  

00:00:00 Cold Open Taiwan National Security Clip
00:00:47 Friday Update From Larnaca Cyprus
00:01:34 Operation M&Ms Ukraine Plan To Hit Moscow Airports
00:03:37 AI Guided Drones With No Human Control
00:05:02 Zelensky Hesitant Then Greenlights The Plan
00:06:19 Fedorov Fired Operation Shelved But Being Revived
00:09:26 Ukrainian Soldiers Desert Training In Germany
00:11:57 Ukraine Running Out Of Volunteers
00:13:21 Von Der Leyen Claims Russia Is Losing
00:15:19 Resnikov Says Draft Women Next
00:17:44 Economic D Day Against Iran Explained
00:18:55 China Rejects Economic D Day
00:20:18 Bessent Confused By Oil Price Spike
00:22:53 Vance Unsure How Long Pressure Will Last
00:25:47 Tusk Blames Germany For Nord Stream Plus Clown World Roundup

Desperate Kiev’s Reckless Moscow Airport Drone Missile Attack Plan; Russia All Day Strike Dobropilia

 Desperate Kiev’s Reckless Moscow Airport Drone Missile Attack Plan; Russia All Day Strike Dobropilia
Topic 1995 

21 août 2026

00:00:00 Short Program Apology From Germany
00:00:36 Massive Russian Strikes On Kiev Overnight
00:01:12 Missile Types Used In The Attack
00:03:05 Zelensky Vows Massive Retaliation
00:04:20 Atlantic Reveals Fedorov's Secret Plan
00:05:27 The Knockout Blow To Close Moscow Airports
00:07:06 Zelensky Rejected The Plan Over Civilians
00:08:07 Real Objections Came From Syrskyi And The US
00:12:31 Fears Of AI Strikes Killing Civilians
00:14:13 Ukraine Situation Far Worse Than In Spring
00:17:21 New Ukrainian Ballistic Missile Coming In October
00:18:34 Ukraine Last Big Throw This Autumn
00:19:18 Manpower Exhaustion And Conscripting Women
00:21:23 Russian Conditions For Any Negotiations
00:26:22 Debate Over European Military Intervention

**THE DURAN SHOP**
https://theduranshop.com

**REVERSE GEAR SHOP**
Athleisure with Style
https://reversegear.shop

**THE DURAN COMMUNITY ON LOCALS**
https://theduran.locals.com   
Join Now Get 1 Month Free Trial

**OUR OFFICIAL CHANNELS**
THE DURAN:    / @theduran  
ALEX:    / alexchristoforou  

**CRYPTO SUPPORT**
BITCOIN: 3JvdnoyWMb93hSRgk58ZstUxg11PW9mKSr
ETHEREUM: 0xF39BdFb41f639B82E3D2Bf022828bC6394F533A3
LTC: MGFiMC18ZViF6DcCixMqAAP11TG4tF6Acj
EMC2: EXX4KK9pZLx7uiLWnCXtp7iMKjtq6o5b6R

**DONATE**
CREDIT CARD: https://donorbox.org/the-duran
SUBSCRIBE STAR: https://subscribestar.com/theduran 
PATREON:   / theduran  

**VIDEO PLATFORMS**
RUMBLE THE DURAN: https://rumble.com/c/theduran

ODYSEE: 
THE DURAN: https://odysee.com/@theduran
ALEXANDER: https://odysee.com/@AlexanderMercouris:a
ALEX: https://odysee.com/@alexchristoforou:7

BITCHUTE:
THE DURAN: https://www.bitchute.com/theduran/
ALEXANDER: https://www.bitchute.com/alexandermer...
ALEX: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/izwN...

**AUDIO PODCASTS**
SPOTIFY: https://spoti.fi/3pMrfPD
APPLE PODCASTS: https://apple.co/2H9Hk0a
SOUNDCLOUD: https://bit.ly/354ASQ9

**FREE SPEECH PLATFORMS**
TELEGRAM: https://t.me/thedurancom
X (Twitter): https://x.com/AMercouris
GAB: https://gab.ai/TheDuran
MINDS: https://minds.com/theduran
OK: https://ok.ru/group/60904083488959

Amazing music contribution from Peter Brown. 
Follow Peter's music:   / peterboy100  

Devant nous, le vide

 Source : https://www.dedefensa.org/article/devant-nous-le-vide

• Alors que l’on débat avec force et insistance de l’emploi possible des armes les plus terribles, nucléaires évidemment, le terrain se prépare (en Iran pour ce cas) pour tous les possibles puisqu’est passé le délai des 60 jours. • Ainsi en juge Alastair Crooke.

__________________________

Quel délai envisager ? Quatre à six semaines est une bonne mesure pour situer le moment où l’Iran commencera à agir en conséquence de l’échec du protocole d’accord dont les 60 jours viennent d’expirer. Certes, Trump et Bessent (qui semble avoir pris le pas sur Hegseth, qui est en aussi mauvais état que le USS ‘Abraham-Lincoln’) promettent des catastrophes pour l’Iran et affirment que le détroit d’Ormouz est aussi ouvert que le Mur de Berlin le 9 novembre 1989...

Tout cela serait plutôt du genre des chiens qui aboient alors que passent les caravanes. Les mensonges et les pitreries diverses finissent par lasser et ce qui passionne les foules aujourd’hui, outre-Atlantique, c’est l’état réel de la « la plus puissante force militaire que le monde ait jamais connu », victime d’une catastrophe bureaucratique qui la paralyse— de même que l’état du secrétaire “à la guerre” Hegseth qui ressemble, au niveau du visage, à Sonny Liston après une dizaine de rounds supplémentaires face à Mohammed Ali. On dit même, les photos commencent à circuler, que l’état du USS ‘George-Washington’ n’est pas meilleur que celui du USS ‘Abraham-Lincoln’ qu’il vient relever. Pauvres présidents, les grands présidents, aucun n’arrive à la cheville et à la rescourse de Trump...

Effectivement, Alastair Crooke nous décrit avec son brio habituel l’état actuel des lieux : en Palestine-Israël-Liban, en Iran-Ormouz, etc., et l’on se demande : mais que peuvent faire les Américains avec leurs forces dans l’état où elles sont, si l’Iran déterre à nouveau la hache de guerre comme il devrait le faire ? Heureusement, il y a Netanyahou et l’IDF ? Est-ce bien assurée, cette puissance qu’on leur prête, avec un Mossad qui vous sort des analyses venues des tapis volants des Mille et Une Nuits ? L’Occident se mobilise tandis que Micron annonce la guerre contre la Russie, — mais en vérité, mobiliser quoi ? Et au nom de quoi ? De l’enthousiasme napoléonien que suscite l’actuel président français ?

Note de PhGBis : « “C’est une page ”, comme dit monsieur Lechat, “héros” des ‘Affaires sont les affaires’ d’Octave Mirbeau... Ou bien “Ne me faites pas rire”, comme disait Talleyrand grimé en évêque (évêque qu‘il était réellement d’ailleurs, bien que défroqué pour suivre l’élégance parisienne), passant devant La Fayette pour aller bénir en ce jour de 1790 la Fête de la Confédération dédiée à l’Être Suprême des révolutionnaires...[pas de vidéo disponible] »

Certes, ce texte ci-dessous, de ‘Conflicts Forum Substracks.com’ est à lire avec l’esprit en état de confluence (connaissance et collaboration) selon la lecture de notre texte de ce même jour sur les tentations délicieuses de l’usage du nucléaire. Ce sont des choses qui font frissonner les nombreux fessiers des neocon de Washington installés dans leurs confortables fauteuils de cuir. Quant aux matelots de la Navy, eh bien, ils n’ont qu’à mateloter comme Trump et sa conseillère Natalie Harp conseillent de le faire et la caverne d’Ormouz s’ouvrira comme celle d’Ali-Baba, — plutôt que celle de Platon, disons.

dde.org

_________________________

 

Trump face à sa poudrière

Trump envisage de hausser le ton pour contraindre l'Iran à capituler... La stratégie de Trump est-elle réalisable ? L'Iran se trouve-t-il dans une situation aussi critique que le suggère le secrétaire au Trésor, Bessent ?

Le protocole d'accord de 60 jours a expiré. Le cadre des conditions préalables iraniennes à toute ouverture de négociations demeure néanmoins au point mort.

Loin du fameux « accord avec l'Iran », la situation est presque diamétralement opposée à ce que le président Trump souhaitait instaurer en adoptant ce protocole d'accord (même s'il est difficile de savoir s'il comptait réellement le faire aboutir à un véritable accord, ou s'il s'agissait simplement d'un instrument utilisé par Trump pour exercer une pression hégémonique américaine totale sur l'Iran et le contraindre à ouvrir le détroit d'Ormuz selon ses conditions).

Mais les pourparlers sont au point mort. Aucune négociation n'est en cours. Le détroit d'Ormuz reste, comme au début, au cœur du conflit et demeure de facto fermé. Parallèlement, le risque d'escalade s'est considérablement accru, voire est devenu presque inévitable, l'Iran ayant clairement indiqué son intention de mener une escalade proactive contre les infrastructures américaines et du Golfe si Trump ne respecte pas, dans les 3 à 4 semaines à venir, les conditions préalables iraniennes bien connues.

Une des premières conditions posées par l'Iran n'est plus implicite, mais explicite : les Iraniens ont précisé que la zone palestinienne devait être couverte par la condition préalable d'un « cessez-le-feu pour tous, ou cessez-le-feu pour personne ». Bien entendu, Israël ne s'y conformera pas. L'Iran intensifie violemment ses attaques – une véritable « mainmise sur le territoire » – contre les camps de réfugiés et les villages palestiniens en Cisjordanie.

De toute évidence, il est peu probable que Trump accepte les conditions préalables de l'Iran. Car, prises ensemble, elles constituent une exigence iranienne sans équivoque : le démantèlement complet de l'infrastructure militaire américaine du siège qui encercle l'Iran – ce qui équivaut à une capitulation américaine au Moyen-Orient.

Trump, plus que tout, déteste être perçu comme un « perdant ».

Pire encore, de son point de vue, sa guerre contre l'Iran, loin de faire du Moyen-Orient un havre de tranquillité et de paix « après mille ans de conflit », comme il l'a prétendu, a précisément exacerbé les nombreuses tensions sous-jacentes de la région, les embrasant. La région est aujourd'hui une poudrière, loin d'être un modèle de coexistence pacifique. Même ses anciens alliés se sont retournés contre lui.

Le conflit le plus grave se déroule en Palestine. Des primaires ont eu lieu pour le Likoud, et des élections générales sont prévues en Israël le 27 octobre. Or, il est déjà clair que des éléments de la droite politique israélienne envisagent de mettre le feu aux poudres en Cisjordanie pour s'assurer la victoire électorale, ou du moins pour empêcher la formation d'un autre gouvernement. Des politiciens israéliens ont laissé entendre qu'une provocation centrée sur la mosquée Al-Aqsa était envisageable.

La situation en Palestine demeure, bien sûr, le détonateur qui pourrait embraser la région. Comme l'explique Ben Caspit :

« Le plan des fanatiques… est de semer le chaos, de provoquer une guerre biblique à la Gog et Magog, à l'issue de laquelle il sera possible de mettre en œuvre le « plan de décision » de Smotrich et d'expulser les Palestiniens… ou de les repousser de fait… La fin de ce plan signifiera la fin de ceux qui rêvent d'une Riviera à Gaza et de foules de Gazaouis partant en bus pour une « immigration volontaire »… Cela n'arrivera pas. Ce qui arrivera, c'est un bain de sang à grande échelle et un danger plus grand, plus réel et plus menaçant que tout ce que nous avons connu jusqu'à présent… »

Alastair Crooke

Le Roi est nu : l’impuissance américaine exposée sur deux fronts

 Chers amis de Paix et Guerre, Au programme de cette Mondoscopie, 126e édition : 

1 )L’Iran reste prêt à tout 2) Moscou durcit réthorique et action mais garde le canal ouvert Pour rejoindre et devenir membre du Cercle Paix et Guerre afin d'avoir accès à de nouveaux contenus exclusifs :    / @cgalacteros   🌐 Merci à notre partenaire NordVPN pour son soutien tout au long de l’année : https://nordvpn.com/galacteros Merci de liker et partager cette vidéo de vous abonner sans oublier d’activer la petite 🔔 vous permettant de recevoir nos alertes. Soutenez nous: https://fr.tipeee.com/paix-et-guerre-... Bonne écoute, CG