"Il n'existe rien de constant si ce n'est le changement" BOUDDHA; Nous devons apprendre à vivre ensemble comme des frères, sinon nous allons mourir tous ensemble comme des idiots." MARTIN LUTHER-KING; "Veux-tu apprendre à bien vivre, apprends auparavant à bien mourir." CONFUCIUS ; « Nous savons qu’ils mentent, ils savent aussi qu’ils mentent, ils savent que nous savons qu’ils mentent, nous savons aussi qu’ils savent que nous savons, et pourtant ils continuent à mentir ». SOLJENITSYNE
mardi 9 juin 2026
La Russie a-t-elle gagné la guerre en Ukraine ? | Sylvain Ferreira sur Paix et Guerre
Chers amis de Paix et Guerre, Bienvenue dans ce nouvel Entretien Géopolitiquement Incorrect dans lequel j'ai eu le plaisir de recevoir Sylvain Ferreira. Livres de Sylvain Ferreira :
- La fin de la domination américaine : https://www.thebookedition.com/fr/la-...
- Les Fantômes d’Azovstal : https://boutique.geopolitique-profond...
dimanche 7 juin 2026
Neutrality Studies Weekly Recap #22
Dear All, As I write on this June 2, it seems as if the Iran War will go back to a kinetic phase. The US-Israeli war alliance is salami-slicing itself into more war, not only by Israel ceaselessly bombing and invading Lebanon—a breach of the ceasefire terms—but also the US has re-started attacking Iranian coastal military installations, mainly radar and command control sites. They call this completely euphemistically “self-defense strikes.” Of course, the mainstream media repeats this utter nonsense even in the titles of its articles. It’s a complete farce, but it shows how low these warmongers have fallen. When you have to claim that attacking another nations radar stations on that nation’s territory is an act of self-defense, then, what’s next? Self-Defense Genocide? This, to me, is the prime reason why the most important article of the UN Charter that needs changing is not the one about the Security Council composition, or the powers of the General Assembly. It’s Article 51, the article that establishes the “right of self-defense” and “collective self-defense” in the first place. So many wars of aggression since 1945 have been started with people citing this article to legitimize their atrocities. The “right to self-defense” must be completely eradicated from international law. There should be no right to use force internationally. Period. “But that’s unrealistic,” many will say. Yes, it is. Of course an attacked state will defend itself. Of course Iran that has been attacked will strike back. Of course the Lebanese are fighting back, of course the resistance in the occupied territories is fighting back. But we must take the legal right of states away to do so, as to also take away that argument from the people who are implementing the attacks. There must be no more legal justification under international law to use force at all. We should solve this dilemma about the attacked and the attacker operating on different moral and legal grounds through legal procedure. An attack under international law should always be punishable by tribunals like the Nuremberg or Tokyo Trials, or through the ICC. The attacked, on the other hand, when fighting back, should still be acting illegally, but if it can show that the illegal use of force came in response to an attack, then that should count not as a justification but a mitigating factor to exonerate from punishment. There is a big difference between recognizing something as a legal right, or a forgivable crime. There should be no more right to violence in international relations. “Self-defense strikes” are an abomination. … Oh, and below are the videos from last week…. should have talked about those in my text above, but I got carried away. 😅 Best, Pascal The DEAD END of US Militarism. The World is Waking up | Prof. Richard Falk25 May, 2026 Prof. Richard Falk argues international law functions where reciprocity exists but is undermined by unipolar U.S. militarism, power hypocrisy (e.g., Israel/Russia), and entrenched elites. He calls for a new political realism, strengthened civil-society accountability, reconsideration of neutrality, and warns of escalating instability without systemic reform. Massive ESCALATION: Europe Uses Ukraine to Expand War | Prof. Glenn Diesen26 May, 2026 Prof. Glenn Diesen warns NATO’s incremental arming of Ukraine has escalated into direct EU-Russia conflict, risking wider war. He cites Iranian deterrence lessons, Western mass-formation and censorship, U.S. strategic retrenchment/outsourcing to Europe, and urges diplomacy, a neutral security architecture and open debate instead of propaganda. Iran Negotiations Dead-End, Abraham-Accord Nonsense, Iran’s UN Strategy27 May, 2026 Pascal argues the Trump-led Iran peace push is incoherent — demanding universal Abraham Accords and surrender of enriched uranium — while Iran insists on NPT-compliant enrichment, removal of US bases, reparations, sanctions relief and Hormuz guarantees. Iran seeks a UN-backed written outcome; MOUs are fragile, JCPOA-style guarantees needed. 🚨 Russia Goes After NATO-War Centers in Kiev, Iran Winning Big | Larry C. Johnson28 May, 2026 Larry C. Johnson warns Russia has entered an escalatory phase, targeting NATO/Western intelligence centers in Kyiv and aiming to seize key cities; U.S. aid and air defenses are insufficient. Iran’s conflict reshapes Gulf security, undermines U.S. influence, and risks severe global economic shocks. USA Collapsing: Washington‘s Soviet Moment Is Here | Col. Douglas Macgregor29 May, 2026 Col. Douglas Macgregor warns the U.S. is in irreversible decline: economic crisis will force a major pullback from overseas, cuts to bases and defense spending. He predicts a Russian ground push in Ukraine (Odessa), warns of NATO escalation, and urges ending U.S. support for foreign wars. |
Dans la guerre, tout le monde perd by Dr. Pamela Chrabieh
|
|
By Dr. Pamela Chrabieh on 6 Jun 2026 |
|
mercredi 27 mai 2026
Escalade massive : l’Europe utilise l’Ukraine pour étendre la guerre | Pr Glenn Diesen
La guerre par procuration de l’OTAN en Ukraine est en train de se transformer en une guerre directe entre l’UE et la Russie. Et les va-t-en-guerre de Bruxelles aggravent encore la situation en attaquant des civils dans le Donbass et en Russie même. Les colombes du Kremlin, y compris Vladimir Poutine, manquent d’options pour contenir leurs propres faucons. Dans l’état actuel des choses, une guerre totale entre l’UE et la Russie n’est pas seulement possible, mais désormais probable. Mais dans quel but ?
Je suis aujourd’hui accompagné de mon collègue, le professeur Glenn Diesen, pour discuter de ce qu’il a appris au fil de ses nombreux entretiens avec des spécialistes de haut niveau des relations internationales en Russie et en Occident, et de la direction que prennent les événements.
Liens :
Glenn Diesen sur YouTube : / @gdiesen1
Glenn Diesen sur Substack : https://glenndiesen.substack.com
Neutrality Studies sur Substack : https://pascallottaz.substack.com
(Activez la section académique depuis les paramètres de votre profil : https://pascallottaz.substack.com/s/a...)
Produits dérivés : https://neutralitystudies.com/shop
Donations : https://neutralitystudies.com/donate
Chapitres :
00:00:00 Introduction
00:00:29 Escalade de l’OTAN et riposte russe
00:19:02 L’Iran et la logique de la dissuasion
00:25:40 L’Europe et le piège de la guerre auto-réalisatrice
00:32:18 Dissidence face aux sanctions et formation de masse
00:39:36 Censure de la propagande et débat ouvert
00:45:41 Issue du conflit en Ukraine et ordre sécuritaire
00:50:49 Déclin des États-Unis et stratégie de guerre par procuration
01:00:33 Réalisme, neutralité et perspectives d’avenir
Original Video: • Massive ESCALATION: Europe Uses Ukraine to...
Original Transcript: https://www.video-translations.org/tr...
Translated Transcript: https://www.video-translations.org/tr...
Produced by: Neutrality Studies
Originally Published on: 2026-05-26
Translations by: www.video-translations.org
Disclaimer: Read by A.I. Voices. Auto-translated.
This video is owned by this channel.
vendredi 22 mai 2026
Russia & China issue Declaration on Multipolarity
Joint Declaration of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on the Establishment of a Multipolar World and a New Type of International Relations
May 20, 2026 The Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China are civilisations with ancient histories. As founding countries of the United Nations (UN) and permanent members of its Security Council and as important centres of power in a multipolar world, they play a constructive role in maintaining the global balance of power and improving the system of international relations. Guided by the ideas of the Russian-Chinese Joint Declaration on a Multipolar World and the Formation of a New International Order (23 April 1997); the Joint Declaration between the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on International Order in the 21st Century (1 July 2005); the Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on the Current Situation in the World and Major International Issues (4 July 2017); and the Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on International Relations Entering a New Era, and Global Sustainable Development (4 February 2022), We state the following: 1. Since the end of World War II, changes in the international landscape and global power relations have accelerated. On the one hand, the wave of decolonisation and the end of the Cold War have led to a significant increase in the number of sovereign states in the world. The global community has become more diverse and complex. The level of development and international influence of states in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Latin America, and the Caribbean has risen. The number of regional and interregional associations, covering all areas of international relations, from politics and security to economics and humanitarian affairs, has increased, and their role in global affairs is steadily growing. Global interconnectedness and interdependence have reached levels unprecedented in human history. Attempts by some states to unilaterally govern global affairs, impose their interests globally, and — in the spirit of the colonial era — limit the sovereign development of other countries, have failed. The system of international relations in the 21st century is undergoing a profound transformation, evolving toward a long-term state of polycentricity and the emergence of a new type of international relations. Most states, drawing on their historical experience, sincerely recognise the dawn of a new era and the need to pursue the path of building a more cohesive international community, embracing mutual respect for fundamental interests, equality, justice, and mutually beneficial cooperation without dividing the world into opposing regions and blocs. On the other hand, the global situation is becoming more complex. On the rise are negative, neo-colonial tendencies, such as the practice of unilateral forceful approaches, hegemonism, and bloc confrontation. Fundamental, universally-recognized norms of international law and international relations are regularly violated, and it is becoming more difficult for states to coordinate their actions and resolve conflicts within global governance institutions, many of which are losing their effectiveness. The global peace and development agenda faces new risks and challenges, and there is a danger of fragmentation of the international community and a return to the “law of the jungle.” 2. As advocates for the harmonious development of an equitable and orderly multipolar world and a new type of international relations, including a more just and rational system of global governance, Russia and China call upon the international community to adhere to the following fundamental principles in their relations with each other: 1) The principle of global openness to inclusive and mutually beneficial cooperation. It is important to overcome global division and promote the elimination of cross-border barriers in various spheres, while respecting the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and identity of all sovereign states. There is no universal path of development, and no “first-class” countries or peoples exist. Differences between states — natural in such a diverse and complex world — should not be an obstacle to the development of equal, respectful, and mutually beneficial relations. It is necessary to respect the chosen development model of each sovereign state. The democratisation of international political relations and the construction of a more open global economy are in the fundamental interests of all countries. Unacceptable are hegemony, coercive policies and unilateral approaches to resolving common problems. 2) The principle of indivisible and equal security. The formation of a more cohesive international community amid growing common risks and challenges for humanity means that the security of one state cannot be ensured at the expense of another. All sovereign states have an equal right to security. It is necessary to pay due attention to the rational security concerns of all countries, focus on cooperation on security issues, reject bloc confrontation and zero-sum game strategies, oppose the expansion of military alliances, hybrid wars, and proxy wars, and promote the creation of a renewed, balanced, effective, and sustainable global and regional security architecture. Disagreements and disputes should be resolved peacefully, addressing the root causes of conflicts. It is unacceptable to coerce sovereign states into abandoning their neutrality. 3) The principle of democratisation of international relations and improvement of the global governance system. All states and their associations are free to choose their foreign partners and models of international interaction. Global hegemony is unacceptable and must be prohibited. No single state or group of states should control international affairs, dictate the fate of other countries, or monopolise development opportunities. The system of global governance and regulation — which should ensure the conditions and benefits of the equal participation of all states in political decision-making — must be continually improved. As an important instrument for regulating the system of international relations, global governance must adhere to sovereign equality, the rule of international law, multilateralism, human-centeredness, and results-oriented approaches. To this end, it is necessary to strengthen the role of multilateralism as the primary tool for addressing multifaceted and complex global problems and prevent the weakening of the UN. Reform of the UN and other multilateral institutions must serve the interests of all humanity and consistently enhance the representativeness and voice of developing states in the international system. The UN Charter is the fundamental norm of international relations, and its principles must be observed in their entirety and interrelationship. Rules developed by a narrow circle of states should not replace generally recognized international law. Large states must assume a special responsibility and mission, place additional demands on themselves, and not abuse their advantages. 4) Global civilizational and value diversity. All human civilisations are valuable and equal in themselves; civilisations are not divided into highly developed and underdeveloped, strong and weak. The spiritual and moral system of no civilisation can be viewed as exclusive or superior to others. All countries must advance a civilisational perspective based on equality, the exchange of experiences, and dialogue. They must strengthen mutual respect, understanding, trust, and exchanges between different nationalities and civilisations, promote mutual understanding and friendship among the peoples of all countries, and protect the diversity of cultures and civilisations. It is necessary to resolutely oppose the use of human rights as a pretext for interference in the internal affairs of other states, as well as the politicisation and instrumentalisation of human rights issues. Religion is an important conduit for human culture, playing a special role in building ties between peoples, and all states should create favourable conditions for interreligious dialogue and exchange. 3. Russia and China will continue to develop a shared vision for the formation of a multipolar world and a new type of more equitable international relations. Pascal’s Substack (Neutrality Studies) is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. |



